Archive for October, 2008

Money lost in Wall Street. Who has it and where did it go?

Friday, October 24th, 2008
Chris S asked:


We know the money wasn’t put in a shredder. Most of the mortgages were all interest. So, WHO has the money in these losses? WHERE is the money that has been ‘lost’? We can’t believe that the ‘news’ is so awful that it won’t follow-up on that question. I’ve asked oodles and they won’t address this.

Steven

What’s a good RSS feed for keeping up with financial news?

Thursday, October 23rd, 2008
Terry M asked:


I would go with the Wall Street Journal if they had free access to their news, so I’m looking for some other source with 1) good financial news and 2) that news available as a feed I can put into my news reader.

The feed would have to be financial-specific, i.e. I don’t want a feed that combines financial news with everything else.

Thanks!

Joanne

The Day Trade of 2009- Wall Street Journal at 75% Off

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008
singapore trader asked:


The latest News can affect all Markets- All Traders know this

So it is very important that we get the latest news, and as it happens.

This why the wall street journal is the first tool that every trader needs.

The wall street journal is arguably the most important trading tool that any trader can use. The Wall Stret Journal which is now also available online is have a fantastic special were for a short time it purchased with a 75% DISCOUNT so you can get it for $1.99 per week. With the choice of online or print .so known as wsj, Wall Street Journal is one of the most popular Financial newspapers worldwide.

The Wall Street Journal is nothing less than America’s true newspaper of record, a window on the world of business, finance, international affairs, and all the delicious little nuggets of news that would otherwise slip through the cracks. Wall street journal newspaper covers financial and other news;  the  wall street subscription price is low and very competitive,  and this is why readers prefer it amongst other competitor newspapers.

Wall Street Journal is one of the biggest USA newspapers by circulation. A complement to the print newspaper, The Wall Street Journal Online was launched in 1996. The Wall Street Journal claims to have sent the first news report,[citation needed] on the Dow Jones wire, of a plane colliding into the World Trade Center on Sept.

 

News

 

As a registered user of  The Wall Street Journal Online, you will be able to:. It “will provide up-to-the-minute business and financial news from the Online Journal, along with comprehensive market, stock and commodities data, plus personalized portfolio information–directly to a cell phone. News alerts via  & science Science Space Tech and gadgets Wireless Games Security Innovation Health Travel Weather Local   Video Photos Community Disable Fly-out Marketplace Shopping Get a Holiday Deal Wall Street Journal launches social network Web site borrows from Internet hangouts like Facebook to boost usage  MSN Tech and Gadgets Innovative tech coming to CES 2009′Naughty’ names are deprived of e-mail.

The newspaper has won the Pulitzer Prize thirty-three times[3], including 2007 prizes for backdated stock options and for the adverse impact of China’s booming economy. A complement to the print newspaper, The Wall Street Journal Online was launched in 1996. Many Wall Street Journal news stories are available through free online newspapers that subscribe to the Dow Jones syndicate. 

 

This is the BEST BUY on the Internet

 

The content of the WSJ is unparalleled. In fact, the online WSJ is vastly more streamlined than Forbes, Fortune, CNN, etc. There is something for everyone in the  WSJ.

Its reputation secure as the nation’s preeminent business news and conservative opinion newspaper, The Wall Street Journal nevertheless fell on uncertain times in the 1990s, as declining advertising and rising newsprint costs—contributing to the first-ever annual loss at Dow Jones in 1997—raised speculation that the paper might have to drastically change, or be sold. [10] It is commonly held to be the largest paid-subscription news site on the Web, with 980,000 paid subscribers in mid-2007.

 Also known as wsj, Wall Street Journal is one of the most popular Financial newspapers worldwide. Please Note: After you complete the simple subscription process you will be able to start accessing your free trial subscription to WSJ. I subscribed to WSJ Online and used a credit card to pay. I’ve been a subscriber for a few years now, and the WSJ is the first thing I read every morning. The WSJ offers a similar variety of subjects with more depth. There is something for everyone in the WSJ. The WSJ offers a similar variety of subjects with more depth.

 There is something for everyone in the  WSJ.

It is of course a remarkable offer getting the wall street journal at $1.99 per week, which can be purchased monthly or on yearly basis, this is must for every trader in 2009



Annie

Terrorist Attacking Wall Street

Sunday, October 19th, 2008
michael Webster asked:


 

BY MICHAEL WEBSTER: INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER Sept 18, 2008 1201 PM PDT

U.S. government law enforcement agencies including the SEC, FBI and DOJ are on alert and are believed investigating terror and other related short selling illegal manipulation of the market place.

It was reported that between August 26 and September 11, 2001, groups of speculators, including Middle Eastern country investors, some reported connected to terrorist such as Al Qaeda and the Ben Laden family, these groups were believed connected to predicting the demise of certain airline and buildings including the New York Trade Center. Still others were identified by the American Securities and Exchange Commission as Israeli citizens, who sold “short” a list of 38 stocks that could reasonably be expected to fall in value as a result of the pending 911 attacks. According to the reports these speculators operated out of the Toronto, Canada and Frankfurt, Germany, stock exchanges and their profits were specifically stated to be huge. Apparently none of the suspicious transactions could be traced to bin Laden because this news item quietly dropped from sight, leaving many people wondering if it tracked back to American firms or intelligence agencies

The feds have seen a possible similar trends operating on Wall Street recently and no end to the panic selling on Wall Street. US corporate regulator, the SEC, is seeking to ease the terror by implementing emergency rules relating to short selling.

This possible action will be stronger than the recent use of the emergency powers that the SEC invoked in July to slap a temporary ban on “naked” shorting of 19 companies, including the mortgage insurers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and a number of major investment banks and commercial banks. The new aim will be to stop “unlawful manipulation” of American companies and their stock and to hopefully help to maintain orderly markets. Just how much damage has been done is not known but is believe catustrafic.

Short selling of stocks involves the opportunity to gain large profits by passing shares to a friendly third party, then buying them back when the price falls. Historically, if this precedes a traumatic event, it is an indication of foreknowledge. It is widely known that the CIA uses the Promis and other cutting edge software to routinely monitor stock trades as a possible warning sign of a terrorist attack or suspicious economic behavior. A week after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the London Times reported that the CIA had asked regulators for the Financial Services Authority in London to investigate the suspicious sales of millions of shares of stock just prior to the terrorist acts. It was hoped the business paper trail might lead to the terrorists.

The US Government as a result of the recent falling market has now nationalized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, by investing American tax payer’s money to hopefully bail them out. US Government has also nationalized the world’s largest insurer, American International Group, (AIG) which was not on the SEC’s list. That so far has cost the American tax payer an additional 80 million for an 80% ownership of the shares. This nationalization of Massive American institutions is a socialization of America. The government claims by placing them in what it dubs as “conservatorship” will give the American people the opportunity to make money should the government be able to turn it around. However even should they make money on the deal it is hard to see how the American people could benefit from it, according to Wall Street insiders? All this while two of the major investment banks on the SEC list have now disappeared — Lehman Bros and Merrill Lynch. 

Naked” short selling practice is technically not illegal, but dealer-brokers are required to have “reasonable grounds” to believe the securities can be borrowed to enable settlement.

The SEC has long held the power to make emergency orders, but it is only now that they are invoking orders that will be unprecedented. Such orders may become permiant.

The SEC has also adopted a rule that makes it fraudulent, and a violation of the law, if short sellers deceive broker-dealers or any other participants as to their ability to delivery securities within time for settlement.

The new rules apply until October 1 unless further extended. Their introduction follows strong lobbying by the American Bankers Association to clamp down on short selling amid concerns that the price of their stock was being manipulated.

“We are concerned about the possible unnecessary or artificial price movements based on unfounded rumors regarding the stability of financial institutions and other issuers, exacerbated by ***** short selling. Our concerns, however, are no longer limited to just financial institutions,” the SEC said.

“In addition, we have become concerned that some persons may take advantage of issuers that have become temporarily weakened by current market conditions to engage in inappropriate short selling in the securities of such issues,” it added.

In regard to the few remaining Wall Street financial institutions lift, like Mogen Stanley, Goldman sacks may have fallen victim to such practices. The feds are worried and have become concerned about “sudden and unexplained” declines in the prices of securities, which could create questions about the underlying financial condition of an issuer, which in turn could create a crisis of confidence without a fundamental underlying basis. This crisis of confidence could impair the liquidity and viability of an issuer “with potentially broad market consequences”.

Washington Mutual and other deposit banks are in jeopardy. Other sectors still American car makers and other and related industries are all venerable to short selling techniques and the SEC is committed to stop this dangerous type of maneuvering.

The real controversy over ***** short selling, however, concerns price manipulation. Here the fear is that a maverick trader could spread false rumors about a company while massively shorting its stock. Such aggressive actions would allegedly push the price down, allowing the trader to reap a guaranteed profit from his self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

The matter of 911 is still under investigation and none of the government investigating bodies -including the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and DOJ -are speaking to reporters about insider trading. Even so, suspicion of insider trading to profit from the September 11 attacks is not limited to U.S. regulators. Investigations were initiated in a number of places including Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Luxembourg, Hong Kong, Switzerland and Spain. As in the United States, all are treating these inquiries as if they were state secrets.

Given all of this, at a minimum the government regulators who are conducting the secret investigations have known for some time who made the options puts on a total of 38 stocks that might reasonably be anticipated to have a sharp drop in value because of an attack similar to the 9/11 episode.

 

The silence from the investigating camps could mean several things: Either terrorists are responsible for the puts on the listed stocks or others besides terrorists had foreknowledge of the trouble that was about to strike Wall Street or may have even contributed and used that knowledge to reap a nice financial harvest from the instability of the market place.

Federal investigators are continuing to be so closed-mouthed about these stock trades, and it is clear that a much wider net has been cast, apparently looking for bigger international fish involved in dubious financial activity relating to the world stock markets.

There was unusually heavy trading in airline and insurance stocks several days before September 11, 2001, which essentially bet on a drop in the worth of the stocks. The same is suspected being done on some recent failures and weakness like Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Morgan Stanley and others.

 

In reference to 911 just a month after the attacks the SEC sent out a list of stocks to various securities firms around the world looking for information. Many of the same firms who failed this go round were also on that list. At that time the list included stocks of American, United, Continental, Northwest, Southwest and U.S. Airways airlines, as well as Martin, Boeing, Lockheed Martin Corp., AIG, American Express Corp, American International Group, AMR Corporation, Axe SA, Bank of America Corp, Bank of New York Corp, Bank One Corp, Cigna Group, CNA Financial, Carnival Corp, Chubb Group, John Han*** Financial Services, Hercules Inc, L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc., LTV Corporation, Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc., MetLife, Progressive Corp., General Motors, Raytheon, W.R. Grace, Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., Lone Star Technologies, American Express, the Citigroup Inc. ,Royal & Sun Alliance, Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Tornado Reality Trust, Morgan Stanley, Dean Witter & Co., XL Capital Ltd., and Bear Stearns.

For related articles Google or go to: www.lagunajournal.com



Catherine

Why is wall street betting on Democrats winning the white house?

Thursday, October 16th, 2008
nasty s asked:


I thought the big wheelers and dealers were hard core republicans

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071202/pl_afp/usfinancepoliticshedgefunds

Claude

Where Can I Get the Wall Street Journal Coupons? How Can I Use the Wall Street Journal Coupon Codes?

Friday, October 10th, 2008
vijaya asked:


About The Wall Street Journal

The Wall Street Journal is the most respected source for news and business information.



Wsj.com Discount Coupons and Coupon Codes

Wallstreetjournalonline.com: Deals365.us is the best source for the The Wall Street Journal coupons promotion coupon codes, online discount codes, Wsj.com offer, Wallstreetjournalonline.com promo codes, promotions and discounts. Providing this The Wall Street Journal coupons, Wsj.com discount codes Wallstreetjournalonline.com promo codes you can save lot of money. We have thousands of coupons, discount offers for hundreds of online stores, so you can always find the The Wall Street Journal Deals, coupons, promo codes, discounts, promotions and promotional code from Deals365.us

How can I use Wsj.com Coupon Code?

Just select the coupon code and copy it or write it down and enter in to Wallstreetjournalonline.com discount / promo / coupon / promotion code box of The Wall Street Journal while checkout process. If there no coupon code, the discount will be applicable by clicking on the link(title), or you can find given a Wsj.com coupon code after you click on the link (title). Then complete your shopping at Wallstreetjournalonline.com and get great discount.

Where do you enter a coupon code for The Wall Street Journal?

you’ll enter the online coupon code in your shopping cart while checkout process at Wsj.com. look for a text box that asks for a coupon code, promotion code, promotional code, promo code, discount code or something similar code, and enter your Wallstreetjournalonline.com code in that box then continue shopping to get discount.

The Wall Street Journal coupons, discount codes, promotions, discounts, coupon codes, promo codes or promotion codes while shopping at Wsj.com, you should contact customer care service for Wallstreetjournalonline.com before making your purchase.

One important thing some The Wall Street Journal coupon codes are case-sensitive.

More The Wall Street Journal coupon codes at deals365.us.





Jonathan

Rubin Says Meltdown Doesn’t Exist & No Blame Goes to Wall Street. Is that Why Obama Hired Rubin as the?

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008
At Least Hussein Kept us Safe asked:


… US government gets ready to bailout Citigroup tonight?

“We are NOT on the verge of a meltdown…”

“… Citigroup director said the current financial upheaval is just cyclical. And none of the blame that there was to assign went to Wall Street.:

http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/31/news/economy/rubin_benner.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008013113

Is it easy for Rubin to say that since he pocketed $190 MILLION at Citigroup and gave large donations to Obama?

Gabriel

What do you think about the Wall Street journal not trusting McCain’s judgment on economics? ?

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008
alpha & omega asked:


What effect do you think this news can have on McCain for his quest for the presidency?

Mathew

The Current Credit Meltdown is Actually Good News

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008
C. Read asked:


As the American politicians and the rest of the world’s ‘leaders’ get down on all four legs and yelp that big government is our saviour [blessed be the prophet Obama]; it might be mindful to recognise that this so-called ‘credit crisis’ is really about debt, credit, over-leverage and living beyond our collective means. In the rush to save unions, preferred companies, national champions, wealthy Wall Street brokers, and those connected to the largesse of big government ‘aid’, we should heed the warning of Churchill who once remarked, “We must beware of trying to build a society in which nobody counts for anything except a politician or an official; a society where enterprise gains no reward and thrift no priveleges.” Indeed. A society in which there is no risk, no moral hazard and ultimately no individual responsibility is one not worth living in.

Churchill’s was a laissez faire orthodox liberal - a man who rightly believed that capitalism might share wealth unequally, but that socialism would share miseries equitably. Life is inherently unfair. There is no equality in one’s short earthly existence, except before the law, of opportunity and in the expectation of reward for hard, smart or even lucky endeavour. You can’t socialise life’s risks, nor its unfair character.

If the above is true than constructing massive government along the lines of the EU-topia, or the current BushBama predilection for Keynesianism does not make a lot of sense. Government does not produce anything, it can only take. When BushBama announces that $5 Trillion of new debt and printed money will be used to ‘jump start’ the economy, they are lying. The $5 Trillion is simply debt to be paid by higher taxes and government appropriation of incomes. If you want to stimulate the economy, you would do the following: have low but not zero interest rates; guarantee bank transactions but not socialise the banking sector; cut taxes; engage in more trade; cut regulations and make the existing ones sensible and transparent; and make it illegal for regulated firms to pay off regulators. You would not bail out unionized firms; selected national champions or banks.

The core of the existing crisis is housing collateral and the socialisation of housing finance over 60 years. Debt and credit were created from bad loans. On top of this insane strategy of socialising housing we have credit cards and credit lines and various forms of unsecured debt. Credit cards were started in 1950 by the Bank of America. Credit lines followed about 20 years later. They were buy now, pay later instruments and were vital to create a consuming middle class. The problem is that over time consumer debt became 120% of net annual income, meaning that any temporary income loss could result in defaults and bankruptcy.

We thus have a 50 year credit ‘boom’ building a culture of excessive consumption and ‘wants’. When debt exceeds income by necessity credit failures must follow. So what do governments do ? They of course ‘bail out’ those who take or took, unnecessary risk. If you speculated by buying 4 condos in Miami because the media told you that this is what everyone is doing, and prices decline, your reaction is not one of remorse, learning and probably insolvency, but to ask the mommy state to fund your excess and your poor judgement.

A credit meltdown is necessary in order to re-balance the economy and indeed re-configure society.

What excess credit does is to distort reality. Instead of waiting to pay cash, people prefer to buy now and worry about paying later. Credit usage thus has deep cultural impacts. Instead of thrift and rational living, people are now used to instance gratification, buying above what they can afford, and imitating the ludicrous life styles and images paraded in movies, on tv, and in sexualised and idealised advertising. The consumer culture leads inevitably to pop culture, and just as inevitably to a decline in good character traits, knowledge and cognition.

Allowing the excess in credit to burst is painful but mandatory. It is like lancing a boil, severing a cancerous limb, or performing painful surgery. You need to sacrifice the diseased area to save the rest. Credit spending has been a disease in both personal and corporate affairs. Firms borrowed money against devaluing assets and hired workers, built plants and produced product - all of which was built on credit, not income. Households did the same - upscaling, buying 2nd and 3rd homes, borrowing to buy 2 or 3 cars, and going into debt to pay for education, vacations and unneeded consumer goods.

It was a mirage and now we are paying the price for profligacy and fantasy.

Churchill stated once that, “Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.” How true. Our current consumerist attitudes is at odds with reality. Thrift, saving, individual responsibility and reaping what one sows, is necessary in life. Nothing in life is easy and easy credit is only a temporary drug that will destroy the user over time through repeated usage. This is why recessions and even depressions are necessary. They educate a generation about the real world - about risk, reward, frugality and proper money management.

 

Recessions and depressions are natural and vital processes in society’s development. But of course that is not the lesson that the media, the schools, and the politicians take away. They will wail and scream that the markets have failed; that speculators and Wall Street are criminals; that capitalism is immoral and that only the nanny-mommy state is benign, caring and capable of saving us. They will elevate silly politicians like Obama as messiahs, and engage in pleadings and infantile projections that government must save unions; preferred firms or individuals who did not live frugally or properly. Even worse, the vast majority who live within their means, who pay their bills, who accept risk and reward will be told that unless they transfer their wealth to those who did not follow proper economic management, the world will end, ATMs won’t work and sea levels will rise - not to mention the deaths of millions of cute polar bears.

The whole scenario now unfolding with governments bankrupting the future to save those firms and individuals who ignored reason, basic economic laws and responsibility for their own actions is a travesty. Recessions are positive in that they teach and remind each generation of what not to do. If you use government to shield people and companies from reality you will only prolong and extend economic trouble, and more importantly destroy the economic cultural underpinnings that allow civilisation to develop. Moral hazard, risk and reward, reaping what you sow, and accepting responsibility are not just Biblical injunctions of good behaviour, they are literally the cultural contracts of a truly progressive society.



Erik