Archive for the ‘Finance’ Category

Worrying News From Asia/russia/us Bailouts

Wednesday, December 10th, 2008
Australasian Investment Review asked:


As the US moves towards passing an economic stimulus package and reshaping its banking bailout and assistance, there’s bad news from Asia that should cause tremors here.

The US Senate will vote on the $US872 billion package, the US Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner is due to outline the bank package overnight Tuesday and now there’s news that Russia is looking to reschedule debt.

That has already shaken currency markets in Asia and Europe after it was reported by the leading Japanese business paper, the Nikkei.

The move was then confirmed by this report on Bloomberg

“Russian banks asked the government to moderate talks to restructure $US400 billion of loans to foreign banks falling due within four years, said the head of the Russian Association of Regional Banks.”

“It would be most effective if the debt were restructured so it’s clear to everyone, creditors and borrowers, how the debt will be paid,” Aksakov said. “The government has the money. Some companies and banks have rather large hard currency liabilities on their balance sheets.”

Speculation of European bank losses on Russian loans drove declines in the euro against the dollar and yen today. Russia has pledged more than $200 billion in emergency funding as plunging oil prices push the world’s biggest energy supplier into its worst economic crisis since 1998 when it defaulted.

The euro fell sharply on the report, sliding against the US dollar and the yen. The Australian dollar also fell under 66 US cents, down nearly 2 cents in a day.

The newspaper quoted a Russian banking industry official as saying up to $US400 billion in debt was at stake.

Nikkei claimed that a proposal for postponing repayment had been submitted to the government and some foreign banks have already agreed to start negotiations.

The news overshadowed more worrying news from China, Taiwan and Japan.

Chinese inflation fell to its lowest pace in over two years at 1% in January and a senior researcher with the Bank of Japan, the country’s central bank, has warned that the country’s economy faces a severe contraction.

Chinese producer prices fell 3.3%, the lowest in around seven years as the slumping in oil and fuel prices, plus the slowing economy, continued to curtail price pressures seen for most of 2008.

The fall in price pressures came after exports fell in December and growth cooled to an average 6.8% in the 4th quarter (and in reality probably didn’t move at all). That was the weakest growth for 7 years.

Figures mentioned in media reports for January’s exports suggest a further fall after December’s weakness. We should know today or tomorrow.

The 1% rise in consumer prices in January from January 2008, when prices started rising after higher oil prices and the impact of huge winter storms pushed up food and power costs, was after they rose by 1.2% in December.

China’s economy grew 9% in 2008 after a 13% rise in 2007.

In Taiwan, a combination of the Chinese New Year and the global recession saw the country’s exports slump by more than 40% in January, a terrible outcome.

Taiwan is Asia’s sixth-largest economy and exports in January exports fell 44.1% from the same month of 2008, the biggest drop since government records began in 1972. It was also the fifth consecutive month that exports have fallen.

Japanese exports in December plunged 35%, South Korea’s by 32%.

In Japan the Bank of Japan’s top researcher warned on Monday of an “unimaginable” contraction in the Japanese economy in the current quarter after new figures revealed soaring bankruptcies and another fall in machinery orders.

The Financial Times said that the comments from Kazuo Momma, head of the central bank’s research and statistics department, “underscore the gloom surrounding the world’s second largest economy as export orders dry up, companies shut down production lines and consumers snap shut their wallets and purses”.

“From October to December the scale of negative growth (in GDP) may have been unimaginable – and we have to consider the possibility that there could be even greater decline between January and March,” Mr Momma warned in a speech yesterday.

It would be “quite a while” before inventories adjust.

Nissan this week revealed 20,000 job cuts and a loss of close to $US2.9 billion. Last Friday Toyota warned of its biggest ever loss in the year to March 31 of over $US4 billion.

On Friday, it cut its global production estimate for the year to March to 7.08 million, down 20%, as it put a third of its global assembly lines on a single shift.

“The sales environment has worsened dramatically in the past month and a half in the main markets of Japan, North America and Europe,” Executive Vice President Mitsuo Kinoshita told a news conference.

For the year to the end of March, Toyota now expects an operating loss of ¥450 billion ($US4.95 billion), three times what it forecast in late December

Car sales in Japan fell the most in 35 years last month.

Before Toyota on Friday Mitsubishi and Mazda revealed big loss estimates. Panasonic, Hitachi, Toshiba and NEC, giants of Japanese and global business in their sectors, all warned of losses of a size not even contemplated by the most pessimistic of forecasters four weeks ago.

Panasonic will lose around $US4 billion and is sacking thousands of workers, as is NEC and the other companies.

It’s no wonder the country is heading for its worst postwar recession as factory output slumped an unprecedented 9.6% in December (8.5% in November) and unemployment surged.

Japan announces fourth quarter gross domestic product data next week. Tokyo-based economists say GDP will have fallen more than 3% compared with the previous quarter – an annualised decline of well over 10%.

Many companies have suffered the effect of the domestic slowdown and the collapse of export markets in the US, Asia and Europe: cars and consumer electronics being prime examples.

The effect on corporate capital spending has been marked, with core private-sector machinery orders plunging 17% quarter-on-quarter in the three months to December, their fastest fall on record.

…….

The US has unveiled a three-part program to stabilise the financial system, a move that failed to meet the credibility test at first glance.

 

US sharemarkets fell sharply, down more than 4% as analysts and investors digested the details of the plan announced by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Oil prices plunged to well under $US38 a barrel.

It was the biggest fall of the year so far on Wall Street. Our market will open weaker today.

 

What analysts saw they didn’t much like, from initial comments. The general tone of the comments was ‘too little’ and not tough enough on so-called ‘zombie banks’ which are institutions still alive but not doing much business.

But there’s also an element of being reminded of the reality of the US financial system and economy: that it is essentially broke, along with most of the big names in banking (and perhaps insurance) .

An unrealistic bullishness had been around last week ahead of this plan being announced. Some reality has hopefully been restored, but the plan itself could have been more realistic as well.

 

The main components of the Treasury’s package are a joint public- and private-sector fund to buy as much as $US1 trillion of illiquid assets and a $US1 trillion program to supply new credit to consumers and businesses.

The plan also calls for additional taxpayer to be injected funds into banks, while imposing tighter restrictions that will include limits on dividend payments, acquisitions and executive pay.

 

An initial fund of $US500 billion to absorb toxic assets will be established and $US50 billion will be committed to prevent home mortgage foreclosures, which is still the driving force of the current instability.

 

Mr Geithner said in his speech revealing the plan’s outline, that the plan would “bring the full force of the US government to bear to strengthen our financial system so that we get the economy back on track”.

However, he did not put a price tag on the new plan, which is expected to exceed the remaining half of the original $700 billion TARP. The US Treasury will not ask Congress for more money right now.

The Treasury will also “stress test” the big banks to see how well they are placed to handle a further slowing of the economy, and provide additional funds as needed. Banks receiving money will have to provide details about their intended uses for the money.

A key element will be the public-private investment fund started with $US500 billion “with the potential to expand up to $US1 trillion” to help cleanse the banking system of toxic real-estate assets.

This will serve the role of an aggregator bank, or “bad bank” to help financial institutions value their mortgage securities and clean up their balance sheets.

A second element will include additional capital injections into banks.

“While banks will be encouraged to access private markets to raise any additional capital needed to establish this buffer, a financial institution that has undergone a comprehensive ’stress test’ will have access to a Treasury-provided ‘capital buffer’ to help absorb losses and serve as a bridge to receiving increased private capital,” the Treasury said.

Thirdly, the Treasury and Federal Reserve will expand the existing program to boost lending for mortgages and other consumer and business loans to up to $US1 trillion.>

The Fed would lift the amount to $US1 trillion from the previously announced $US800 billion for its Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, which would accept mortgage-backed securities and securities backed by car loans, credit card loans, student loans, and some small business loans.

The expansion “would be supported by the provision by the Treasury of additional funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program”, the Fed said. The Treasury has already ’seeded’ this fund with $US20 billion.

Meanwhile the US Senate has passed its version of the Administration’s fiscal stimulus bill by 61 votes to 27 on Tuesday, clearing the way for Congress to thrash out final legislation for President Barack Obama to sign into law, hopefully by the end of this week.

Democrats forced through the bill with support from only three moderate Republicans, hurting Mr Obama’s hope of bipartisan backing for the plan

The Senate bill now has to be reconciled with the House of Representatives version passed last month before sending final legislation to the White House.

The House version contains about $US 100 billion more spending than the Senate bill, which includes more tax cuts.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.



Adam

What’s All This Doom and Gloom on Wall Street?

Saturday, December 6th, 2008
Larry Parr asked:


Copyright (c) 2008 Larry Parr

Why all the doom and gloom over falling stock prices? The only reason investors are worried over a crashing market is because they just don’t know how to trade stocks.

My portfolio is up almost 100% each and every trading month. Whether the market is going up or the market is going down, it’s all the same to me.

I really can’t get behind all of this financial hand-wringing and whining. If stocks are going down then sell short. Or buy puts. Or even sell calls. I mean, there are plenty of ways to cover your assets in a falling market.

Oh, I know the government put some restrictions on short-selling for a few days. They even put restrictions on buying certain puts for several days. There have even been restrictions on market orders placed before the opening bell, but so what?

Are we all so locked in to the silly little notion that all we can do is buy and hold stocks for the long term that we’ve all forgotten how to roll up our sleeves and get a little dirty? There’s TONS of money to be made in the markets right now. Today. In fact, EVERY trading day, whether the market is soaring or going straight down the crapper is a fantastic day for any trader who understands the markets and knows ahead of time which way they’re going.

That’s the real problem most traders have, isn’t it? They simply haven’t a clue how the markets really work. And what’s worse, many of them THINK they understand what’s going on. They THINK that fundamentals or some piece of breaking news is what is driving the short-term direction of the market.

I’m sorry, but those blinkered investors get very little sympathy from me. Wake up and embrace the markets in all of their multi-directional splendor!

You can’t just sit back and wait to make money in a market that’s spiraling ever higher. That market’s a memory. It may return, but right now you’ve got to switch financial gears and get with the program.

First of all, understand that stock prices are NOT random and never have been. Stocks trade to a very precise mathematical pattern. Always. Every day, rain or shine, up-market or down-market stock prices are predictable.

It’s easy enough to see that for yourself. Just place a child’s plastic protractor on the high point or the low point of almost any stock chart and look at where prices fall. Just look at how many daily trading ranges hit the 50, 60 or 70 degree line on your protector TO THE PENNY.

Now look for chart gaps. How many of them are cut by one of the three degree lines I just mentioned? 100% of them?

How can any of that be in a random market? It can’t - obviously.

Now just as obviously you can’t trade the markets using just that child’s protractor, but the point is THE MARKETS AREN’T RANDOM. Whether you can see the whole pattern or not isn’t important. The important thing is that the markets aren’t random.

And if they aren’t random then there MUST, by definition, be a pattern to them…there MUST be a way to predict them.

So don’t settle for guessing which way the markets are going. Learn how to use Fibonacci ratios. Experiment. Let your imagination run wild as you pour over chart after chart looking for the formula that will tell you with laser-like precision what the short-term direction of the market is.

The answer is there. In a non-random market the answer HAS to be there.

Because once you abandon the idea that the markets are random, and once you disabuse yourself of the notion that your broker knows more about stocks than you do, then the sooner you can commit yourself to discovering the truth behind the markets and the sooner you’ll be able to smile every trading day regardless of the direction the market is headed.



Alvin

Madness, And The Delusions Of Wall Street Hedge Fund Managers

Monday, September 22nd, 2008
Adam Lass asked:


By Adam Lass, Senior Editor, WaveStrength Options Weekly



How to (calmly) make 160% as Washington and Wall Street go stark raving mad.

“All the secret signs say it’s a bottom. From here, things just start looking better and better.”



“No, it’s going to get worse – a lot worse – and then bottom out.”



“No you’re wrong: It’s the end of the friggin’ world! You should invest in guns, gold, canned food… and a life raft.”

Each of these disparate – indeed completely contradictory – opinions has been foisted on us over the past couple of days, each from supposedly unimpeachable sources like the U.S. Federal Reserve, New York’s Conference Board and well-placed sources at several hedge funds.

I don’t blame you a bit if you’re a tad confused. I follow this stuff for a living, and some days, I can’t make heads or tails of what these guys are trying to say.

It’s almost as if they all have gone stark raving mad.

Remember “Bad?”

Let me see if I can sort it all for you. The Fed says that we are in the soup about as deep as we ever have been. They’ve asked us to tear up all their old statements and projections.

You’d better start with the one about how the economy is only in a short mild recession (the prediction that replaced: “We are only in a flat stretch”), since it is already so obviously wrong. In a few more weeks, we will have notched up five full quarters of declining GDP, a feat we haven’t managed since 1991.

Now the Fed is calling for diminished (if not diminishing) output till 2011.

Depth-wise, they were calling for the economy to fall off some 0.2% in 2009. Unless, of course, it grew 1.1%. They weren’t quite sure, you know.

Now they are a tad more certain. Unfortunately, it’s to the downside, a 0.5% loss for 2009.

Well, Now We’ve Got “Worse”

Remember back in the good old days of late 2008, when they thought unemployment might hit 7.1%? A month or so later, it’s already at 7.6%.

But now the Fed warns we may look back on even that figure with warm nostalgia. Now they are warning we may hit 8.8% before the year is out.

But maybe, if we are really, really lucky, and say our prayers every night, we may see the figure whittled back down to 7.5% in 2011.

Interestingly, they place a great deal of faith in 2011, now. Not only is unemployment supposed to return to a level that was previously predicted as the maximum high, but the economy is supposed to grow as much as 5% that year.

Unless, of course, they are forced by cold hard facts to change their minds again.

“This Time We Really Mean It!’

Not to worry, says Fed Chairman Bernanke, because this time we are going to “pull out all the stops” to get things going again. In remarks before an incredulous audience at the National Press Club, Bernanke admitted that: “Recent economic statistics have been dismal, with many economies, including ours, having fallen into recession.”

But there is good news, Bernanke assures us: “In the United States, the Federal Reserve has done, and will continue to do, everything possible within the limits of its authority to assist in restoring our nation to financial stability and economic prosperity as quickly as possible.”

He’s not lying, you know. The Fed has been playing with what it describes as “aggressive new tools.” These tools are so “aggressive,” the Fed’s balance sheet has more than doubled $900 billion last September to somewhere around $2 trillion today.

Bernanke is completely complacent as to the exceptional dangers he has taken on: “The credit risk with our nontraditional policies is exceptionally low,” because as soon as we get things straightened out these programs can be quickly reversed “to avoid risks of future inflation.”

Yeah, I shudder too when I hear that, but let’s move on for a moment.

Some “Good News?”

The latest out of the NY Conference Board: The economists there are done totting up the figures for January, and note that their Index of Leading Indicators actually rose 0.4%, the second positive reading in two months and an actual doubling of December’s 0.2% increase!

The Board’s Ken Goldstein claims that this means the recession’s “intensity” will ease over the next few months. The problem is, the Board wasn’t piecing together this index back in the 1930s, which is the last time the data looked anywhere near this grim. So their conclusions may be just a tad skewed.

Indeed, when I broke open the report and dug into the numbers, I found that the primary item pushing the index higher was the marked increase in cash in circulation. Yeah, I’ll bet that is pushing the index higher, seeing as how M3 doubled over the past few months – a feat never seen before in modern history.

Or Not!

Which brings us around to the inevitable result of that doubling: Remember all those assurances from Bernanke et al. that inflation was dead? Yeah, well, you need to tear up that prediction too.

Seems that inflation in January posted its biggest spike in six months. Wholesale prices rose 0.8%, four times December’s 0.2% increase. This unsettling increase was led by a 3.7% surge in energy prices.

But don’t let anyone kid you that this was only “volatile non core.” First of all, we saw the ugly truth behind that myth back in 2006 and 2007, when energy prices percolated into the mainstream economy with devastating effects.

Beyond that, core prices also picked up a robust 0.4%. And all of this is already edging into consumer prices, which were up 0.3% in January.

It’s Baaaack (and I Am Loving It!)

Yeah, that’s right, folks. For all the talk of “potential deflation,” it’s inflation that is rearing its ugly head again, just as we predicted here in TD.

Also rising like a phoenix from its own ashes, we saw gold shining through to a robust $1000 an ounce for the first time in nearly a year. This spike has pushed WOW reader’s position in Gold SPDR (GLD: NYSE) calls to $14.20 for gains of 85% over some six weeks. We are still watching this position with great interest and expect gains to reach as high as 160% in the near future.

In fact, we rate gold’s risk so low right now, we are recommending additional calls against senior miners as well. We anticipate Washington’s lunacy to hand us an easy double on this position as well.

I’d like to claim remarkable prescience here, but really it was a no-brainer. Every wiseguy on the Street knows you simply can’t double dollars in circulation with impunity.

Yeah, the market might appear to rise. Heck, that’s exactly what happened from 2003 to 2007. But it turned out to be a mirage that evaporated the moment we looked at it too closely.

So they are all doing exactly what you should be doing: grabbing a piece of something solid as fast as you can.

Now That’s Just Crazy Talk

Which brings us to that last thought at the beginning of the article – the one about guns, gold and bottled water. Back in the dark days of December 2008, back when we thought the world was falling apart (as compared to now, when things look just dandy), New York hedge fund managers like Gene Lange began to get just a tad spooked as to how the whole story might end.

Lange told Timothy Sohn of New York Magazine that in December, he and his friends began stocking up on guns, food water diapers and other necessities. Lange’s compound over the river in New Jersey is replete with a biometric ammo safe and a military surplus diesel-powered off-road vehicle.

He is even contemplating stashing a motorized lifeboat somewhere on the edge of the Hudson, so he can get off the island if things go all “I am Legend” on us.

These guys are nuts, right? Completely out of their tree.

Seriously, that’s just never going to happen. We’ve weathered storms like this before without seeing our grand cities turn into cannibalistic jungles. Soup lines? Maybe. House parties even? Possibly.

But Donner Parties? Naaah.

Still, it tells you a lot about the intellectual capacities of the idiots who happily led us into this mess, and are pretty much still madly swinging the levers of power back and forth.

Crazy, just crazy.



Charlene

Investment Banking and the Future of Wall Street

Sunday, August 3rd, 2008
Jose Roncal asked:


The current economic meltdown has changed the face of Wall Street, possibly forever. For decades the energy in the market had been fueled by high-rolling investment bankers, but look what’s happened in the last eight months. Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. Bear Stearns was snapped up by JPMorgan Chase, Merrill Lynch got bought out by Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley had to convert to bank holding companies just to stay in business. Five major investment banks . . .and then there were none.

At the beginning of this year, those five firms had a combined market value of around $250 billion with the top firm, Goldman Sachs, valued at nearly $90 billion. Now the top banks, which are comparatively small boutique firms—Raymond James, Jefferies & Co, Greenhill & Co, Keefe Bruyette & Woods and Piper Jaffray—have a combined market value of $12 billion, a number that has shrunk by a factor of 20.

Essentially, the global economic crisis has ushered in the era of universal banking where massive financial firms offer every conceivable kind of investment product and service. Even smaller brokerage firms face being herded under the umbrellas of big banks, or else risk becoming irrelevant.

Historic Realignment of the Industry

When Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley opted to become bank holding companies it marked an historic realignment of the financial services industry and the end of a securities firm model that had prevailed on Wall Street since the Great Depression. But why did they make the change? Partly because it’s given both firms access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window — the same line of credit that is open to other depository institutions at a lower interest rate.

As bank holding companies, they can also tap into deposits from retail customers. The two firms had already received a temporary financial lifeline from the Fed—the Primary Dealer Credit Facility—the special reserves established to bail out Wall Street broker-dealers like the Bear Stearns deal in March 2008.

Even though Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now classified as bank holding companies and are part of the universal banking model, they’ll still be able to engage in investment banking activities. But after years of loose oversight by the Securities and Exchange Commission, they’re now faced with tighter regulations imposed by the Federal Reserve and they are subjected to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation oversight.

The Golden Years of Investment Banking

A quick historical review of investment banks will serve as a backdrop to the events that led to their downfall.

Independent investment banks have been around for a long time, but originally they were small private partnerships that earned most of their money from offering corporate finance and investment advice, as well as some broking and other services. If you had walked into one of their offices and looked around, you might have mistaken it for a large law firm.

The success of their business model depended on the trust built through long-term relationships. There wasn’t much money at risk in the early days because the firms operated primarily with the partners’ own money. That meant there weren’t vast sums available to gamble on risky ventures with excessive leverage. But the lack of working capital and a desire to orchestrate splashier deals, motivated the firms to go public in the late 90s.

The Downfall Begins

With more capital in the coffers and a growing access to low cost, short-term debt, managers started to make larger, riskier capital bets—most recently those troubling and toxic mortgage-backed securities.

The regulations that had once separated investment banks from traditional banks were no longer in place. That opened the way for big global banks like Citigroup and JP Morgan to start competing with Wall Street for what had traditionally been the domain of the investment banking business. This forced Wall Street firms to expand their services, to use more leverage and to take even bigger risks.

When those risks led to profits, the dealmakers were rewarded with outlandish bonuses and the wheels were set in motion for bigger risk-taking. Throw patchy government regulation into the mix and you have, as the saying goes, a recipe for disaster.

Before long, major Wall Street firms were leveraged three or four times more than conventional banks, yet they still operated under far less stringent regulations than the banks.

It wasn’t until the financial crisis reared its ugly head in mid-2008 that the U.S. Fed stepped in and for the first time, allowed investment banks access to their discounted funds. Then when the credit crisis hit, highly leveraged Wall Street firms like Bear Stearns and Goldman Sachs found themselves in even deeper trouble. They’d already suffered huge losses with their hedge funds and high-risk ventures, but their excessive leverage compounded their problems as the credit crisis stripped them of the ability to raise the additional capital they needed to survive.

The Outlook for Wall Street

What’s the outlook for those working on Wall Street now? No doubt there will be less excitement and no more of the huge bonuses that dealmakers had grown accustomed to. But there are bigger concerns about whether the U.S. will lose its competitive edge and the ability to maintain its power status in the global financial system.

Some of the best and brightest might pull up stakes and head for better opportunities in the burgeoning Asian Markets, or they could flip over to the unregulated Hedge Fund market—at least for as long as those funds manage to survive. Thousands of Hedge Funds are going out of business, bringing serious grief to investors like the huge public pension funds, foundations and endowments that have poured billions of dollars into these private partnerships.

If there is any good news in this economic fiasco, it’s this: Main Street stands to eventually benefit from a better regulated Wall Street. With a more transparent financial system, a firmer foundation and a stronger business model, there might be a promising outlook for more stable and consistent growth.



Erin

How To Get A Discounted Wall Street Journal Subscription

Monday, July 21st, 2008
Brandi Yates asked:


Chances are, you already know about all the reasons that you want to read the Wall Street Journal. You may want to know what’s going on in the world or maybe you just want a decisive viewpoint when it comes to political or business matters. In any case, you already know that the Wall Street Journal is well worth the money that you spend on it, but what if you could get it for even less? This paper has a lot to offer even the casual reader, and whether your interest is casual or you are a devoted reader, you will find that there are still plenty of reasons to look into getting a discounted edition!

The truth is that there are many different ways to get a discount on your Wall Street subscription, and if you have an interest in making sure that you are going to get the best news for the best price, there are several different options for you to explore. For instance, as soon as you buy a subscription, you are already saving around seventy percent off of the news stand price. With a little bit of planning, making sure that you get the paper regularly is already a great deal!

One great way to save on your Wall Street subscription is to make sure to mention if you are a student. If you are a high school or a college student, you will find that you can get three different types of subscriptions, all lower than the average price. You can pay $19.95 for 10 weeks of both the print and online edition, $49.95 for 26 weeks of both editions, or $99.95 for a full year of both editions. This takes a full 75% off of the cover price, so take advantage of this great rate if you can.

Another way that you can get great savings if you have been a long time subscriber of the Wall Street Journal is to let your subscription lapse slightly. When you are considering what you can do in order to make sure that you are getting the best rates, you will notice that the current new subscription rates are quite good. You can currently save 50% on the first thirteen weeks, after which, the one year renewal is set at $200. This will let you get a full year of this newspaper for around $3.49 every week.

You will also find that by getting the print and the online editions together that you can get some great savings. You can get a whole year for $175 plus four free weeks as well. While this is the best deal out there, you should also keep in mind that there are a few options that will let you read the online articles completely free of charge. All you need to do is to make sure that Wall Street site believes that you are coming from a referral site like Google or Digg. You can do this simply by searching for the headline on Google or by doing some referral spoofing, which is simple to do after you have downloaded the ref spoof add on for Firefox.

Take some time to think about what you want to pay for your Wall Street subscription and see what you have to do to make that price apply to you!



Justin

Who Else Wants Up-To-Date Forex News?

Thursday, April 17th, 2008
anonymous asked:


From coast to coast, and worldwide, Forex is the leading provider of financial analysis for the everyday consumer as well as major corporations. Forex news provides information on a number of different levels. Its easy to use homepage helps answer any questions to all inquiring minds that work in the arena of the financial markets of the world. If you are a person that is a mover and a shaker, you need a website that will have important data at the tips of your fingers. After visiting their website, and accessing the news, you will have to look no further.

Forex news understands how important Wall Street really is and because of that they have included that currency market in an easy to use toolbar. Other features on the net, includes news and analysis regarding your traded compiled at all times of the day. The easy to use systems can also provide audio so that you can set the computer to rattle off the day’s information leaving you free to tend to other issues. Vital announcements are also readily available, allowing for lightning fast reaction to news, and not just any news, but forex news. Another feature of the site is the “articles and ideas” section to help kick-start that brain of yours to think outside the box, and there is an insights portion which will link you to an industry professional’s view on future market trends.

The global calendar allows for fluctuations in the market to be monitored and interpreted by the consumer. Forex news doesn’t just simply regurgitate information; it dissects crucial material in the marketplace and hands it to the traders on an easy to use web site. This handy guide, channels imperative reports on the current week and gives a snapshot view of key economic events happening in the country as well as worldwide. From stocks, to home investment news, forex news has got what you need.

Some forex news features that have been now added to the site include: threaded forum, classic thread, and Forex chat. These have been included to help the user to receive all the know-how and expertise needed in our ever growing and changing financial world. Today’s financial analysts are looking for the best edge in order to contend against growing competition, and now you have to look no further. Forex news will provide all of the information you need and more.



Jason

How to Get the Best Price on the Wall Street Journal Newspaper

Saturday, March 8th, 2008
Brandi Yates asked:


If you like the Wall Street Journal but have resigned yourself to reading your neighbor’s leftovers because you don’t think you can get your own at a price you can afford, think again. In fact, you can get the Wall Street Journal at a discounted rate that should fit your budget. You can also read the Wall Street Journal online; you can even read part of the Wall Street Journal for free online. Read on to find out how.

Getting a discounted rate on the Wall Street Journal

The Wall Street Journal offers several different options depending on what you want. You can buy an online subscription, get discounts depending on who you are, and even have it delivered to home or office.

The print edition subscription

If you buy the print edition of the Wall Street Journal for a year, you’ll save the most; this is 80% off the cover price. It’ll cost you $119 year. You also get two weeks for free with this offer.

The combination print and online subscription

If you like your news online and in print, you can get both; for $155 a year, you can have the convenience of reading online whenever you want as well as the print edition at your fingertips. And with this offer, you get four weeks for free.

The weekend edition

The weekend edition is a souped-up edition of the weekly paper and includes the same intensive news coverage it always has. Beyond that, though, the weekend edition also covers fashion and lifestyle, leisure and arts, books, entertainment and culture, dining and cooking, and much more. As opposed to the weekday version, this is a bit more “family friendly,” and definitely “weekend casual.” This comes free if you pay for the online and print editions at $155 a year. And this subscription option lets you get your weekday paper delivered to your office, but your weekend edition delivered to your home, for no extra charge.

The student discount

If you’re a high school or college student, you can take advantage of the Wall Street Journal (both print and online editions) for just $19.95 for 10 weeks or $99.95 for 52 weeks. Be advised that if you want this rate, you’re going to have to verify that you are a student at the institution you have named.

If you really, really want it for free

If you really can’t afford to pay for the Wall Street Journal at all, there is a way you can read at least some of it for free. Let’s say you know there is an article you really, really want to read from the Wall Street Journal, but its “subscriber only” feature blocks you from reading the whole article. The solution to this is to go to Google News, for example, and type in on the article title, you should be able to find it and access it for free.

The Wall Street Journal is for everyone

So there you have it; no matter your budget, you should be able to get the Wall Street Journal delivered right to your home or office whenever you want, for the best news on the planet — or at least read some of it online.



Jamie

Wall Street: Where Money Grows

Friday, February 1st, 2008
A Raymond Randall asked:


When working, I listen to Bloomberg Television. Commentators and guests banter about the stock market, the Federal Reserve, interest rates, corporate stock, and national news. The day changes, the news is similar, but never trumpery.

As interesting as daily stock market news is to me, I often wonder if market reports matter when most investors are too busy and distracted to pay attention. Investors stay-tuned for the closing market averages; if the market is up, all is right with the world. If the market is down, “I’m in it for the long haul.” If the market cascades unexpectedly, investors second-guess investment decisions.

“Buy! says the Bull” “Sell!”, says the Bear. Who is Right? Stock and bond trading is a tug-of-war between the Bears and the Bulls (similar to the Democrats and the Republicans): one group sees what’s right, the other group sees what’s wrong. Both are opportunists.

If too many become Bulls, the suspicious Bears salivate; when the Bear corrals the Bull, the Bulls know their time is near. Bear traders see the glass half-empty; bull traders see the glass half-full. Together, they make a “market” where stocks, bonds, mutual funds, options, commodities, and derivatives are traded. The Bull and the Bear each get it right, but seldom at the same time; that’s how markets are made.

“Securities markets are a fast-moving, glamorous, complex, multi-billion-dollar business.” The largest located in New York, London, and Tokyo and and the emerging markets located in Sao Paulo, Karachi, and Jakarta, and they all have a history.

In the 13th century, a small group of investors issued 96 shares of the Bazacle Milling Company in Toulouse, France. Trading paper for grain did not catch French imagination (or anyone’s) until the 18th century and the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.

* The 1700’s brought innovation and advancement: 1712 - Thomas Newcomen patents the atmospheric steam engine. * 1756 - John Smeaton invents hydraulic cement. * 1769 - Nicolas Cugnot invents the motorised carriage. * 1775 - Alexander Cummings invents the flush toilet (thank God). * 1778 - Oliver Pollock, a New Orleans businessman, creates the $ symbol * 1798 - Income tax introduced by British parliament (but of course)

New York Stock Exchange investors started “ringing the trading bell” in 1790. A 12 foot high wooden stockade separated that “trading floor” from the British and the Indians. On May 12th, two years later, 24 traders and merchants met under a Buttonwood tree at 68 Wall Street to sign the “Buttonwood Agreement” that empowered them to trade securities for commission. Their agreement is the first of many for the NYSE.

Essentially, stock market entrepreneurs sold paper in place of commodities. Trading cows, land, or lumber became too cumbersome. Further, selling a companies “paper” raises capital for the company, and gives ownership to the investor. Farmers harvest the grain, “listed ” companies process and investors hope they do it right so they can shop for groceries.

The French voiced what every investor sometimes feels: if you cannot hold it in your hand, ownership is risky, while local farmers did not like big city highfalutin ideas. Holding a tangible object may be at the root of all risk concerns. Don’t make a promise, take me to the store so I can have “it”.

On Friday afternoons, I would visit my 82 year-old grandfather. Grampa would sit in his sun porch while I asked him questions about his youth. He owned a lumberyard and believed in tangible goods. I was working for Merrill Lynch at the time, and we always talked about the stock market. One day he said, “The stock market is filled with thieves and hoodlums. It is not as safe and predictable as real estate.”

On his first point, I could not agree; on Grampa’s second point, I would agree that many folks have more value in their real estate (home) than their stock market portfolio. However, real estate prices are contracting, and the stock market is up today. Further proof you should own a little of both because it’s all about asset allocation.



Kim